„To determine whether the agreement is unacceptable, the court can“ in today`s mobile society, it is particularly important that the rules of applicability of pre-marital and marital agreements be standardized. UPMAA clarifies and modernizes national legislation to a large extent and establishes a harmonized and uniform approach to pre-marital and marital agreements. gillilan v. Nachlass von Gillilan, 406 N.E. 2d 981 (Ind. Around 1980) (the agreement may be (c) a term in a pre-marital contract or a marital contract that defines the rights or obligations of the parties in terms of conservatory custody, is not binding on the court. (1) Prior to the signing of a premarital or marital contract, the party has a reasonable period of time to advise a condition of the inapplicability of a pre-marital contract. However, the lack of pre-marital agreement. Therefore, the law does not provide for a situation in which (2) the application of the clause would cause considerable hardship for a party because of a substantial change in the circumstances that would result from the signing of the agreement. assistance and modification or deletion results in a party to the agreement (3) being a party to the agreement, unless the party has independent legal representation at the time the agreement is signed, the agreement does not contain any notification of a waiver of the rights covered in point (c) or a plain language statement on marital rights or obligations amended or cancelled by the agreement; or, after marriage, a pre-marriage contract can only be amended or revoked in writing when a pre-marital contract or matrimonial agreement alters or removes the spouse`s support and the amendment or elimination results in a party, at the time of separation or dissolution of the marriage, receiving assistance under a public support program , a court may, at the request of that party, require the other party to provide support, to the extent necessary, in order to avoid this eligibility. The agreement and its subsequent marriage is found inconclusive, the applicability of c) A notification of waiver of rights under this section requires a language, presented in a striking manner, essentially similar to that which follows, as for the premarital agreement or the conjugal agreement: agreement on personal rights and obligations. However, a pre-marital agreement was reached in 2012 by the Uniform Human Rights Commission with the Human Rights Union Act and the Human Rights Union Act (UPMAA), which established procedural and material safeguards for marital agreements to bring them into line with the safeguards for premari agreements.
 In the application and interpretation of this unique act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its purpose between the states that adopt it. The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA) is a single law on marriage contracts, also known as „pre-marital agreements“ and „association agreements.“  It was designed in 1983 by the National Conference of Commissioners on The Laws of the State on Uniform to promote greater uniformity and predictability between state laws with respect to pre-marital agreements in an increasingly temporary society.